RE: [security-services] Change Log

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>]

OK I am down to one issue:

 DS-14-07 BearerIndication 
 	I believe the agreed text can be found in an "old"  version of core.

 	PHB: Which being the question

All I can find is:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200201/msg00208.html

>     242  ISSUE:[DS-14-07: BearerIndication] 
>     243  This functionality is provided in the Web Browser Post Profile,
which specifies the use of a 
>     244  bearer SubjectConfirmationMethod, but this is not present in the
core spec. This is unresolved. 

status=CLOSED

addressed by SubjectConfirmation et al


I suspect that the issue name is not the same as the part of the spec it
refers to.


Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
Principal Scientist
VeriSign Inc.
pbaker@verisign.com
781 245 6996 x227


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:pbaker@verisign.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:01 PM
> To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Subject: [security-services] Change Log
> 
> 
> All, I am working on the changes, there are a couple of 
> issues that have
> come up. Help appreciated.
> 
> ---------->>>MS-2-02 Acknowledgements 
> 	The text is in a message from Eve on 2/11. 
> 	No, it isn't
> 
> ----------->>>MS-5-04 Use Response in Post 
> 	
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200203/
> msg00030.html
> 	The text is in a message from Prateek on 3/5. 
> 
> 	Before I commit this change, do we want to delete Elements
> <TargetRestrictionCondition> and <Target> and all references 
> thereto?	I
> believe so.
> 
> 
> DS-14-07 BearerIndication 
> 	I believe the agreed text can be found in an "old" 
> version of core. 
> 	PHB: Which being the question
> 
> 
> These changes have been made:
> 
> 
> 0) usual numbering changes
> 	These are accepted in the change log as they are otherwise a
> distraction.
> 
> 1) searched for occurrences of X Assertion and changed to Assertion
> containing X statement.
> 
> 2) Indeterminate text
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200203/
msg00081.html

3) DS-1-11 Subject Confirmation vs. AuthN Method 
	I took the text proposed by hal in
	
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200202/msg00046.html
	instead of repeating the text as suggested I put a single copy at
the start of section 7 which appears to me to be the place where any
confusion would arise. Also changed the heading accordingly etc.

4) DS-1-12 Clarify NameIdentifier 
	
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200203/msg00052.html

5) DS-4-14 AuthorityKind and RespondWith 
	This is currently deferred waiting for the debate to subside

6) DS-9-13 AuthNQuery underspecified 
	
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200203/msg00004.html
	Added as suggested to 3.4.4, however the logical flow appears to me
to indicate that what to do if you can't construct a response should be
described after you describe how to attempt construction of a response.

DS-11-08 Action and Actions 
	
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200202/msg00186.html
	Done



DS-14-17 Remove Assertion Specifier 
	
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200203/msg00042.html
	Done, the schema was in Eve's message.

DS-14-18 Change Evidence 
	
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200203/msg00042.html
	Done 






Curently deferred:
Tentative preliminary draft proposed text forISSUE: AuthorityKin d and
RespondWith 

MS-1-02 URI References 
	This is ELM-6. The text is in Eve's message from 3/7. However, note
that it may require many chages throughout the documents.
	[deferred till after lunch]

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200203/msg00085.html 
<<Phillip Hallam-Baker (E-mail).vcf>>

Phillip Hallam-Baker (E-mail).vcf