[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] New (minor) Issue: AuthNMethod,not Confi rmationMethod in AuthNQu ery
> I'm not so sure about this. I recall some discussion of
> people wanting to
> say "Give me an authn assertion, if you have one that contains
> ConfirmationMethod 'foo'." That way, the requester could go
> on and perform
> the confirmation to make sure they're talking to the right subject.
>
> However, this isn't something I'm interested in supporting,
> so don't have a
> problem with your change.
But this functionality is already present in the use of Subject that I am trying to eliminate. The spec already says subjct has to match so comfirmation method (and data) is effectively a filter.
Hal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC