OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

security-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [security-services] FW: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: N extStep?


Title: RE: [security-services] FW: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: N ext Step?

Actually the Yahoo news article has  a long quote about how they wanted to go to W3C but were rebuffed. So I think that particular bridge is fairly well burnt.

One thing a lot of people haven't realized yet is that the new TC will have to liaison with the Security JC. So we will have a pretty good forum for achieving cooperation amongst the several Security TCs. If they had gone to W3C, we would have had to try to establish liaison with each TC individually, if at all.

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:pbaker@verisign.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:15 PM
> To: RL 'Bob' Morgan; OASIS Security Services TC
> Subject: RE: [security-services] FW: SOAP Confidentiality and
> Integrity:
> N ext Step?
>
>
> No, I don't think we can say that. However the chances
> of the W3C membership approving a direct competitor to
> WS-Security are negligible.
>
>               Phill
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: RL 'Bob' Morgan [mailto:rlmorgan@washington.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:41 PM
> > To: OASIS Security Services TC
> > Subject: Re: [security-services] FW: SOAP Confidentiality and
> > Integrity:
> > Next Step?
> >
> >
> >
> > Does the submission of the WS-Security specs to OASIS (and
> the meeting
> > announced by Phill) mean that there will *not* be a "web services
> > security" activity chartered within the W3C?
> >
> >  - RL "Bob"
> >
> > ---
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:24 PM
> > > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > > Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org; 3.org@w3.org; www-xkms@w3.org
> > > Subject: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This email is a final step in a thread in how to start work
> > on providing
> > > confidentiality and integrity for SOAP messages. I've
> > discused a range of
> > > security issues [1] with a conclusion that this topic
> > (soap+xmldsig+xenc)
> > > is most pressing; however, I was not able to find agreement
> > that this issue
> > > should be shoe-horned into an existing WG, instead it
> > should be part of the
> > > Web Services security. [2]
> > >
> > > Though I'm relatively ignorant of the ws-arch discussions,
> > I've heard the
> > > ws-arch WG is considering this issue and will try to have charters
> > > available for work in July [3], but that the immediate
> > issue might also be
> > > delayed be consideration of the bigger issues.
> > Consequently, I'd recommend
> > > that a charter for work in the WS Activity be specified
> > with a scope no
> > > larger than [4] -- and potentially more narrow (e.g.,
> > without tokens). A
> > > "web services security" community does not yet exist (or it
> > does, but it's
> > > fragmented) and starting work on this immediately not only
> > commences with
> > > the work, but helps build a community which then can
> > contribute to the
> > > larger discussion. For instance, because standardized
> > security components
> > > do not yet exist, specifications such as XKMS [5] may end
> > up specifying
> > > "one-off" versions in the short term. However, these could
> > be contributed
> > > to the WS work. We all know somebody who knows somebody who
> > is in the other
> > > WG, but sometimes that isn't quite enough. <smile/>
> > >
> > > In conclusion, I advocate a charter with specific and
> > immediate terms, and
> > > an active recruitment of participants. Please let me know
> > if and how events
> > > are likely to be otherwise. Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2002AprJun/0022.html
> > [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xenc-xmlp-tf/2002Jun/0002.html
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/05/28-ws-cg-irc.txt
> > [4]
> >
> http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/security/library/ws-secu
re/?dwzone=sec
> urity
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnglobspec/
> html/ws-security.asp
> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2002Jun/0016.html
>
>
> --
> Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
> W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
> IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
> W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC