OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

security-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: [security-services] RE: [saml-dev] status code value

> Since we say "MUST be prefixed", I interpret this to mean that it's
> acceptable to use a non-prefixed (but implicitly qualified) value.  So
> think Scott's first example wouldn't be correct.  Comments from anyone

> on this?  Do we need to broaden the language in a future version?

I wrote that text, and the language is actually "MUST be prefixed
appropriately", by which I meant it has to be properly namespace
qualified like any QName, not that it had to be prefixed. Sorry if it
wasn't clear.

In practice, I don't think people rely on default namespaces for QName
values too often anyway, it's just confusing.

-- Scott

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC