[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] editorial comments on binding and core drafts
I've tried to deal with these comments, but somehow got a little lost in the line numbering (can't match your numbers up with either the track-changes-on or -off versions of core-06). Mishra, Prateek wrote: > line 1352 > > replace , by . Can't find this one; perhaps fixed by Rob's comments as well! > 1355-1357 suggests that minor versions are backwards compatible. This is not > in > fact the case with SAML 1.1. Should we call attention to that SAML 1.1 is > not backwards > compatible with SAML 1.0 admittedly in only a very narrow aspect of the > schema. I've attempted to clarify this. > 1398 Is there some additional context here? How can we > prevent a SAML requestor from arbitrarily issuing such a > request? Couldn't find this one. > 1533 Can we identify a specific attribute names here? If I'm right about the region you mean, I believe we do list the three "identifier attribute" names already. Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]