Subject: RE: [security-services] Groups - liberty-architecture-overview-v1 .1.pdf uploaded
From: "Mishra, Prateek" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: 'Michael McIntosh' <email@example.com>, "Mishra, Prateek" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:34:49 -0400
for sending this, I missed it before. It appears that this unsigned email
message comes from several OASIS SS TC members who also happen to be LA
members. Has the TC received any definitive statements directly from the LA
Also, even if this submission has received the LA
Board's approval it remains unclear whether it meets the conditions for
submission under OASIS. There are several specific conditions required for
submission to OASIS that do not appear to have been addressed by the email
message. Please see: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php
I am sorry I do not follow this line of reasoning. What are the specific
conditions that have not been met? To my knowledge all of the conditions in http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php
are met by the submissions. Could you please point to the specific portions (section
numbers, text) of http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php
that you believe have been violated?
Has the OASIS Board made it's
position clear on this specific set of documents? I suggest that any relevant
statements related to IPR be collocated with the documents in the archive.
I am sorry I do not understand your question. The SSTC is an autonomous
group that functions under the rules given in http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php.
Are you suggesting that the OASIS board must give an opinion on day-to-day TC
McIntosh/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "'Jeff.Hodges@sun.com '"
[security-services] Groups - liberty-architecture-overview-v1