RE: [security-services] RE: IBM charter position

[Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>]

Conor,
I know all groups have oral traditions,
 folk lore and written documents ....
and its hard to always capture the subtleties
of people's expectations.....we're just trying to get some of the folk
lore written down here....
It seems we are going around on several
things:

In the charter Scope of Work.....

on bullet one, will there be (or is
there, and I missed it) some collection of the issues and requirements
that have been collected?
        (Conor,
this is what gets confusing........Is OMA one of these providers of issues
and requirements?)

on bullet 3, do we need to define or
at least illustrate what the "various identity federation models"
are or could be?
        (
In my previous life with SAML several years ago,  we started to address
Kerberos & Passport.....is this still part of the models?  )

Bullet one says its dealing with "real
world" implementations of SAML....are we looking for a real world
federation model as well?
Will we include the WS* work ? Do we
agree that a ubiquitous standard for federation is desirable? and that
considering non-SAML federation is practical?  
Or,  if non-SAML federation is
not in scope of SSTC (as you suggest)
 than is the goal of the SSTC to
 define a SAML to SAML identity federation model?

Thanks.
Maryann