[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Proposed dates for closing discussion on work items
This may already be clear to others through others, but I'd find a clarification useful. For purposes of this discussion, are there criteria defining the expected depth of discussion that qualifies as a presented solution? Is it, e.g., something that might comprise a functional description/overview section for a later, more detailed specification, or instead something more, less, or different? --jl -----Original Message----- From: Mishra, Prateek [mailto:pmishra@netegrity.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 1:03 AM To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' Subject: [security-services] Proposed dates for closing discussion on work items At our previous conference call, Hal proposed that we adopt cut-off dates for the following lifecycle events for our work items: 1. agreement on use case/champion/rough scope 2. agreement on solution 3. agreement on document text and schema I would like to throw out some proposed dates for discussion on the call. 1. agreement on use case/champion/rough scope: Dec 9, 2003 2. agreement on solution: Jan 20, 2004 3. TBD at F2F #3 Prateek Mishra Director, Tech&Arch Netegrity p: 781-530-6564 c: 617-875-4970 To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/leave _workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]