[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Roles for SAML 2.0 Metadata
As discussed on the call - it may turn out that many/most of the profiles will require use of metadata. In terms of the Kerberos profile I have to say I don't know - not until we drill down a bit further. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: 19 December 2003 19:59 > To: 'Anthony Nadalin'; security-services@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [security-services] Roles for SAML 2.0 Metadata > > > >Why is this restricted to any role this seems like an artifact > of Liberty ? > >These should just be attribute assertions that any role can use. > > Metadata is the data that drives SAML profile and binding interoperability > and efficiency. If a particular "role" is not identified in those > documents, > then it doesn't need metadata as such. IMHO anyway. > > But as new roles are identified as needing metadata, a provider's metadata > can be extended to include its metadata for those roles. > > -- Scott > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the > roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/mem > bers/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]