Re: [security-services] Roles for SAML 2.0 Metadata

["Eve L. Maler" <Eve.Maler@Sun.COM>]

Aha, I think we got tangled up in "analysis" vs. "design" perspectives 
here.  We did indeed accept this work item and the associated use cases, 
but it's true that we have not yet done any final acceptance of the 
solution proposal.  So if you have any specific alternative solution 
proposals, now is exactly the time to bring them forward.

Jahan was asked to publish the list of participants/roles we're 
considering, which is sort of like a finer-grained use case discussion. 
  It sounds like you prefer a design solution where the list of roles 
somehow becomes irrelevant.  Again, a specific proposal will allow the 
TC as a whole to judge whether your approach meets the accepted use 
cases better than the existing solution proposal.

	Eve

Anthony Nadalin wrote:

>  >Given our decisions already made to date on this work item, what's up 
> for grabs now is not *why* to do things this way, but rather *which* 
> config >data to cover for now.
> 
> I disagree, just because someone else did it this way is no reason to 
> accept, so I believe all items are still up for grabs.
> 
> Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122
-- 
Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Products, Technologies, and Standards    eve.maler @ sun.com