[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Propose addition of a SubjectRef element
> I Don't mind adding this. However, I still prefer that we have an > assertion level subject that applies to all statements implicitly > unless it is overridden by a subject within the statement. This is incredibly messy if we ever support statements that have truly optional subjects. I don't know what that might be, but all in all I just don't see the point of trying to "sort of" change the data model. Change it or not. > We see that most of the time, the Assertion will have a > single subject (while allowing for those who see otherwise) > and we would like to optimize that case. I agree. Doesn't a SubjectRef element do this? The cost is pretty minimal with much less invasiveness than an assertion subject. That just plain doesn't fit the statement model, IMHO. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]