[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Minor comments/questions on W28a-attribute-draft-03-diff
> > Line 128: "in order for an attribute to be returned" -> "in order for an > > attribute value to be returned" > > Will look at and reword as necessary. > [Rob] After re-reading it myself, I think it is correct the way it was as long as the point is that we won't return an associated <Attribute> element in the response (which contains an <AttributeValue> element). If we want to be precise, we may want to use formal element names instead of descriptive prose.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]