[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] RE: AuthenticationMethod / NameIdentifier andKerberos authentication
> When the IESG complete their review of Kerberos > clarifications the Kerberos 5 protocol will be assigned a new > RFC number, so using 1510 is not good moving forward ? Maybe > we can support both :1510 and :Kerberos in SAML 2.0 for > backwards compatability ? Right, well, like I said, if the method URIs change anyway because we move them into context classes, then it's moot. If not, the committee can decide whether we need to deprecate it or whatever. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]