[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] SAML 2.0 tech overview - initial diagrams
Scott, I will draw them all any way. Then later we can decide which to include and produce a description. At least this way we can validate whether the way I have interpreted the profiles/bindings combinations is they were intended to be described. Hopefully I should be able to post all the diagrams either later today - or tomorrow. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: 30 June 2004 15:39 > To: 'John Hughes'; 'oasis sstc' > Subject: RE: [security-services] SAML 2.0 tech overview - initial > diagrams > > > > The question is whether I should have diagrams/descriptions for > all of the > > above. Its not much extra work - as having done a couple of them - the > > rest will be just variations. They question is rather about the > > balance between completeness and verbosity. > > I tend to think we can stick to the variants we think are most important > (and probably by extension the ones that are MTI). > > -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]