[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] sstc-saml-profiles-2.0-figures-01.pdf
I understand. My point was there was no *guaranteed* response (in case of failure). However, I found the section in Core that defines that failure behavior and clarified my question about this profile. Thanks, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Hodges [mailto:Jeff.Hodges@Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:40 PM To: oasis sstc Subject: Re: [security-services] sstc-saml-profiles-2.0-figures-01.pdf Beach, Michael C wrote: > Question: > > On page 2 for Logout functionality, I assume 4. <LogoutResponse> may > not occur? From this section of sstc-saml-profiles-2.0-draft-17... 1145: 188.8.131.52 Session Participant/Authority issues <LogoutResponse> to Identity Provider The session participant/authority MUST process the <LogoutRequest> message as defined in [SAMLCore]. After processing the message or upon encountering an error, the entity MUST issue a <LogoutResponse> message containing an appropriate status code to the requesting identity provider to complete the SAML protocol exchange. ..it looks like that step must occur. JeffH To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/l eave_workgroup.php.