[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Conformance with identifiers/affiliations (long)
> In Liberty ID-FF 1.2 conformance testing, this simply meant that a > target SP was able to decode the encrypted name identifier that was > produced for it by an IDP. Ok, but I wouldn't call that a test of NameID Mapping. I asked a few times on calls whether we considered encryption a separate conformance item, but I got the sense people considered all uses of encryption in core to be MTI (subject to whatever algorithms we require). So if that's a concern, people should speak up. But NameID Mapping is a separate protocol, it just happens to make use of encryption. And I don't think it's an SP thing, in the sense that we define SP as the relying party for SSO. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]