[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Web SSO <AuthnRequest> conformance
I am afraid I still don't follow why there is a need for an additional MTI feature. Is the argument that most AuthNRequest's do not commonly fit on HTTP URLs? We haven't found this to be the case but then that is just one opinion. Maybe I havent understood the real issue in this thread. - prateek -----Original Message----- From: Scott Cantor [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 6:24 PM To: 'Thomas Wisniewski' Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: [security-services] Web SSO <AuthnRequest> conformance > Seems reasonable. Do you feel it will be added to the conf > spec as MUST? I'd be in favor of making POST MTI, and I think we have to do something. The ability to do artifact was mostly just a consequence of layering the spec the way I did (i.e. you get it for free architecturally), but there wasn't overwhelming interest in using it for anything else. -- Scott To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/l eave_workgroup.php.