[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Re: Question about IPR on the final SAML V2 specs
> > > Where are the licenses for the > > use with SAML? > > Wouldn't there have to *be* Liberty-related patents for use with SAML for > there to be licenses? > > I've yet to see a message from anybody claiming there are any. I think > it's > suitably clarified that what applied to the original contribution is a > separate issue (and was documented per OASIS requirements). > > It would be *wrong* to link to the > to > that contribution. > [RSP] If
the companies in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200412/msg00000.html If and
when such declarations are made, they will be posted to the SSTC IPR page. As
Conor pointed out in: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200411/msg00129.html only
AOL and Fidelity had issued patents that applied to ID-FF. It is up to those
companies to decide whether those claims apply to SAML 2.0 and to provide
notice to the OASIS Executive Director regarding those claims and any necessary
licensing terms. The chairs of the TC have been and will continue to work
with the OASIS Executive Director to facilitate the process of obtaining those
notices. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]