[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Re: Question about IPR on the final SAML V2 specs
And one additional clarification... > > > only AOL and Fidelity had issued patents that applied to ID-FF. My statement was not quite correct. It should say that AOL and Fidelity are the only companies with issued patents that apply to ID-FF *** who provided notices of withdrawal from the default licensing terms as specified in the Liberty member agreement ***. RSA Security also has patents that we believe apply to ID-FF. These are the same patents described in our notice to OASIS for SAML V1.x and V2.0. The only difference is that for Liberty, we accepted the licensing terms as specified in the Liberty member agreement and thus we did not need to file a separate notice with Liberty. I was trying to avoid confusing things even more than they already are by just referring to those companies that had filed notices with Liberty. However, someone pointed out to me that my statement was technically incorrect, so I figured I better correct it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Philpott, Robert [mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:10 AM > To: Jeff Hodges; security-services@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [security-services] Re: Question about IPR on the final SAML > V2 specs > > Yes - those are important points. > > Thanks Jeff. > > > Rob Philpott > Senior Consulting Engineer > RSA Security Inc. > Tel: 781-515-7115 > Mobile: 617-510-0893 > Fax: 781-515-7020 > mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeff Hodges [mailto:Jeff.Hodges@neustar.biz] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:00 AM > > To: security-services@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: Re: [security-services] Re: Question about IPR on the final > SAML > > V2 specs > > > > some subtle-but-important clarifications... > > > > > > > only AOL and Fidelity had issued patents that applied to ID-FF. It > is > > up to > > ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ > > /believe/ they hold /they believe/ apply > > > > > > > those companies to decide whether those claims apply to SAML 2.0 > and to > > ^ ^ > > /they believe/ also > > > > > > > provide notice to the OASIS Executive Director regarding those > claims > > and > > > any necessary licensing terms. The chairs of the TC have been and > will > > > continue to work with the OASIS Executive Director to facilitate > the > > process > > > of obtaining those notices. > > ^^^^^ ^ > > such , if any. > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > security-services-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: security-services-help@lists.oasis- > > open.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: security-services-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: security-services-help@lists.oasis- > open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]