Re: [security-services] Metadata extension proposal/namespace

[Greg Whitehead <grw@trustgenix.com>]

I prefer

> 	urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:metadata:ext:attrreq

to

> 	urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:metadata:extension

if only because it establishes a convention to use when we do our next 
extension.

-Greg

On Mar 22, 2005, at 1:24 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:

> Per the focus call, I'd like to bring this document for a vote:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11805
>
> This is a small proposal for an extension role to cover the stand-alone
> attribute query use case. It also covers any case where SAML attribute
> queries are composed with a non-SAML-specific profile, so it's fairly
> important to get a common extension for it, I think.
>
> The XML namespace is currently:
>
> 	urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:metadata:extension
>
> This isn't that far off what Eve was tossing around, but tweaking it 
> would
> be no big deal. I personally don't think a version number needs to be 
> in it,
> but if we had one, I think it belongs at the end, not in the middle.
>
> I'd maybe propose something like:
>
> 	urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:metadata:ext:attrreq
>
> With regard to the CD draft of the SAML 1.x metadata, we could alter 
> it by
> changing the namespace to match this convention as well, and then vote 
> a
> second CD.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> security-services-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> security-services-help@lists.oasis-open.org