[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Comments on metadata 2.0 extension spec
> - line 137 (example), the urn should NOT include the "2.0" reference. > > - the schema is missing the import for Metadata. Hopefully Eve can clean these up in the prep for CD...? Speaking of which, based on the new document processes, I think it would be a reasonable thing to vote these into a 60 day review, and then ultimately as committee specs (leaving open but not requiring another vote for submitting them). The review period gives us a way to make sure they're working and fix them if need be. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]