[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] From commitee draft to committee specification
I'm in favor of moving the SAML 1.1 Metadata CD to CS status. In as much as this is a normative document, and one that we would like to see support for in the marketplace, I think it is appropriate to move it forward. I don't know if attestations are required to advance to CS, but I can attest that Trustgenix has successfully implemented the current specification (and we interop tested our implementation at Catalyst this week). -Greg On Jul 15, 2005, at 2:12 PM, prateek mishra wrote: > In the previous conference call, there was interest expressed in > moving the saml 1.1 meta-data CD (and perhaps other drafts as well) to > committee specification. This would involve a 60 day public review > followed by an additional vote for committee specification. This > process is fully described at: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#stand_approv_process > > Under previous rules, such as those followed for SAML 1.X > specifications and additional CDs (e.g. technical overview), there was > no such entity as a committee specification. > > The purpose of this e-mail is to initiate a discussion on this topic > so that TC members are aware of of these changes as well as member > interest in creating committee specifications.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]