[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: PE29: Conformance Table 2
This may require some additional discussion, as the features identified below are already included in Table 4. Isn't that adequate? Or is there an additional need for IdP's to expose these services independent of Table 4? Proposed change: [quote - reference is to Table 2] The table is missing feature rows for performing a “Request for Assertion by Identifier” over SOAP and for “SAML URI Binding”. These features are clearly permissible for IDP’s, since the IDPSSODescriptor includes an element for zero or more <AssertionIDRequestService> elements. [\quote]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]