[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] RE: Comments on draft-cantor-saml-sso-delegation-01
Scott Cantor wrote: >Before answering, let me note that I wasn't specifically submitting this as >a TC proposal, I think there would need to be consensus on specific use >cases needing work from the TC first. > >Thought I'll say for the record that I do think the TC ought to *at least* >consider defining a profile for expressing simple delegation in SAML >assertions as part of its role, and that combining this with the existing >SSO profiles would be a reasonable (and simple) follow-on to that. > > > [Prateek] Understood; I had meant my comments to be interrogativel ("why/what if") rather than prescriptive. I understand that the use-cases and community you are dealing with may be oriented in a certain direction. I agree this is an interesting/important problem and that we should try to figure out some ways forward. [\Prateek]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]