[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Errata comments
Scott, You are right, I did not mean to change the sense of the definition in profiles, only to weaken it to include consideration of an attesting entity distinct from the subject. So re-written: [quote] "The holder of a specified key is considered to be an acceptable attesting entity for the assertion by the asserting party." [\quote] >PE39: > >I think the wording here is off. Leaving aside recent discussions about this >stuff in parallel, Prateek proposes: > >"The holder of a specified key is considered to be an acceptable attesting >entity for the assertion by the relying party." > >I think it's the asserting party that considers this, not the relying party. >Not sure if that's an accidental mistake or intentional change. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]