[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] IPR Transition of the SSTC
They could do so, but they could not prevent the starting of a new TC under the new IPR policy with exactly the same charter. In that case their only choice is to join or not join. There is no veto. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Cahill, Conor P [mailto:conor.p.cahill@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 4:31 PM > To: Hal Lockhart; security-services@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [security-services] IPR Transition of the SSTC > > > > > In summary the process is to select one of 3 IPR modes and > > hold a special vote. In this vote, only individual members > > and company reps vote. Any negative votes will act as a veto. > > So does this mean that if a party wanted to force the SSTC to > close, they could just continue to vote NO on any proposal to > select one of the 3 IPR modes? > > Seems wrong to me, but looking through the transition rules, > the only fallback seems to be that you can go to the Board > in such a case and ask for an exception to the transition > policies. > > Conor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]