OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

security-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [security-services] Re: SAML Profiles for X.509 Subjects


Then it seems that sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-11 has not yet been used -- that's what the name of the next draft of the CD profile will be.
::Ari

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philpott, Robert [mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:53 AM
> To: Tom Scavo; OASIS SSTC
> Subject: RE: [security-services] Re: SAML Profiles for X.509 Subjects
> 
> 
> 
> > > The latter has been formulated as draft-11 of the 
> Attribute Sharing
> > > Profile.
> > 
> > As agreed on the call yesterday, I'm prepared to retract 
> this document
> > set from the repository.  If someone could provide some guidance for
> > doing so, I'd be grateful.
> > 
> > - Should I simply delete the documents?  This will break 
> links so I'm
> > not sure if this is the best approach.  Please advise.
> [RSP] I don't feel you should delete the existing doc's.  The 
> repository
> should keep all files as they were loaded.
> 
> > 
> > - I will create a new set of documents with a different document ID.
> > What is the proper attribution for this new set of 
> documents?  Should
> > the editors and contributors from the "SAML V2.0 Attribute Sharing
> > Profile for X.509-based Authentication Systems" be carried over into
> > the new "SAML V2.0 Profiles for X.509 Subjects", or should we start
> > from scratch?
> [RSP] As of rev -11, you renamed the profile from
> sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-10 to
> sstc-saml2-profiles-x509-draft-11.
> 
> I would go back to the old name and create a rev-11 based on the
> con-call discussion. Then, for the new grid-specific 
> deployment profile,
> I would choose a different unambiguous name.   
> 
> If we are thinking of adding various "deployment profiles" (e.g. this
> one, grid), then perhaps we should create a name structure 
> that reflects
> their purpose.  It might help eliminate confusion with other profile
> documents we already have. 
> 
> Suggestions?
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Tom Scavo
> > NCSA/University of Illinois
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]