[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] errata: alternate definition of strongly matches
> This condition is testable at least. > > Comments? I guess it's fine as a supplement, but we can't say something matches if the key isn't the "same" for some definition of "same". Your supplemental text represents a necessary, but not sufficient, definition, to me. I think there are non-testable requirements anywhere PKI comes into the picture, unfortunately. The text tries to communicate the intent behind the spec as best it can without stepping out of scope. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]