security-services message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: sstc-saml-approved-errata-2.0-cd-01 erratum?
- From: "Ari Kermaier" <ari.kermaier@oracle.com>
- To: "SSTC (E-mail)" <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:20:13 -0400
In cd-01 of the
approved errata, I think there's a mistake in E15 NameID Policy Adherence. Lines
288-289 read:
- When a Format defined in Section 8.3 other than
- urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:unspecified
or
But it seems
pretty clear, from Section 8.3.1 of [SAMLCore] and from E60 of the Approved
Errata, that the correct URI should be:
urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified
This mistake in
the text for E15 (which was carried through from the original proposed text
submitted to the SSTC mailing list by Tom Wisniewski on June 3, 2005) seems to
have caused some confusion among several implementers who took this to
imply that the URI itself was being corrected by the
erratum.
Am I looking at this
correctly?
Thanks,
Ari
Kermaier
Oracle
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]