[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Groups - sstc-saml-holder-of-key-browser-sso-draft-03.odt (sstc-saml-holder-of-key-browser-sso-draft-03.odt) uploaded
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote: > > My argument is the same as it was originally. I don't think it serves either > use case to attempt one profile that addresses SSO with a browser and > stand-alone clients. They share commonality and they also have significant > differences. I would leave it to implementations to decide how to overlap > them. As far as I can tell, a profile for a stand-alone client (which doesn't exist of course) would be a strict subset of the holder-of-key-browser-sso profile. Moreover, the IdP-first subcase of browser SSO is *very* close to the stand-alone client scenario. Thus I don't see much point in having two separate profiles. Tom
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]