[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] comments re sstc-saml-holder-of-key-browser-sso-draft-05
> Well, an alternate approach would be to define a new RoleDescriptorType: > > <complexType name="HoKIDPSSODescriptorType"> > <complexContent> > <extension base="md:IDPSSODescriptorType"/> > </complexContent> > </complexType> > > I think it's cleaner to do it this way. I really don't. That has much more drastic implications for implementations then using the pre-existing mechanisms for extension. Either Nate's approach or using the Extensions element is cleaner than inventing a new role for adding endpoints to an existing role. That really isn't how the schema was intended to work. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]