[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Re: comments re draft-sstc-metadata-iop-02
Tom Scavo wrote: > In fact, this > alternate use of SAML metadata is the reason I referred to the > Metadata Interoperability Profile as a "deployment profile" as opposed > to some universally applicable profile. Leaving aside whether this distinction even matters, no profile is universal. How many people are going to use a certificate-based profile for SSO any time soon? That doesn't make it a community-specific profile, just a relatively less adopted one. The issue to me is whether a profile imposes constraints or assumptions that would make it unrealistic to adopt across a broad range of communities. My goal here is not to convince those communities to do so, however misguided I may think they are. I'm just interested in giving the TC member companies a better opportunity to provide products that meet the needs of a number of communities they aren't serving very well right now. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]