[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] disposition of the HoK profiles
Tom Scavo wrote on 2009-07-01: > I may be missing something but this seems like the best way to get the > HoK Web Browser SSO Profile out the door now without having to > implicitly depend on the successful completion of the kerberos profiles. > > Thoughts? My only comment is that I don't think we've had many, if any, specific examples of specs that we've "revised" following a CS or OS vote. The exception might be the errata, which is now headed to its second published revision, but errata are by their nature accumulative. It becomes a "signaling" problem at runtime if you have behavior that changes between V1 and V2 of some spec that's sharing syntax. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]