[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] disposition of the HoK profiles
Tom Scavo wrote on 2009-07-05: > And I appreciate your comment, Scott, thanks. Others should chime in > as well. Hal's initial reaction on the call was to NOT take the HoK > Assertion Profile to CS at this time, so maybe it's not such a good > idea in general. I'm proposing we do it since I can't see a good > reason not to, but I may be missing something. To be clear, based on what I know of the intentions here, I *don't* think adding some kind of Kerberos-based language here is necessarily going to change the existing language in a way that renders it somehow fundamentally incompatible. I was mainly trying to say "if possible, let's keep it that way". -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]