[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Consent management protocol?
That's correct Scott, but there is an open action item outstanding
from the Kantara Vegas F2F for eGov to look at its needs for Consent Service,
and do a gap analysis against the Interaction Service and feed back any gaps to
the ID-WSF Evo WG. I don't think it's even started yet, but (subject to
asking them) I think eGov would be interested in your requirements Josh and see
how we might more forward together on that. Cheers Colin …………………………………….
John Bradley wrote on 2009-12-17: > Are you talking about the Consent attribute in the
eGov profile? No, that's purely data (whatever it means), but it's not
a protocol or a service. -- Scott From: John Bradley [mailto:jbradley@mac.com] Are you talking about the Consent attribute in the eGov
profile? The
Consent attribute MUST be supported. The
Consent values which MUST be supported, but not limited to, are: urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:obtained
urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:prior
urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:current-implicit
urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:current-explicit
urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:unspecified Or are you thinking of a service more like Eve's UMA? John B. On 2009-12-17, at 2:24 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
Josh Howlett wrote on 2009-12-17: I heard there was some consent management protocol in
Liberty Alliance
CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you. ==== |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]