[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Discovery hint
Scott wrote: > BTW, it occurs to me that in fact the major advantage of doing a > higher > level extension element is actually to change the hint extension > model from > explicit XML to what you might call the "generic property" approach > that a > lot of people favor. > > In other words, this: > > <Extensions> > <krb:Hint>...</krb:Hint> > <ip:Hint>...</ip:Hint> > </Extensions> FWIW, I finally opted for this model. However, SAML2Meta states that "Extension elements MUST be namespace-qualified by a non-SAML-defined namespace". How should I resolve this, given that the namespace for the discovery hint will be a SAML-defined namespace? Is it ok to make this element a child of <RoleDescriptor>? josh.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]