[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: fixes done to SAML assurance draft; ready for review
Hi Bob, I'm still seeing the following problems in the files: 2. The spec now says it was approved as a CD on September 22. Please resend link to meeting minutes where: a) specification was approved as a CD, and b) specification was approved to submit for public review. 3. Specification URIs - This version: need to be actual hypertext links - Latest Version: need to be actual hypertext links 9. Normative references: Hypertext links associated with the URIs of the actual Authoritative Specification are mostly incorrect For example: text: http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-authn-context-2.0-os.pdf actual hypertext link: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/ Regards, Mary On Feb 4, 2010, at 5:16 PM, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote: > Mary: > > The links to the actual documents, as found on the page that I sent you the link to yesterday, are: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/36084/sstc-saml-assurance-profile-cd-01.odt > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/36085/sstc-saml-assurance-profile-cd-01.pdf > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/36086/sstc-saml-assurance-profile-cd-01.html > > Let me know if you need more from me on this. > > - RL "Bob" > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Mary McRae wrote: > >> Thanks Bob; please send links to the actual documents. >> >> Regards, >> >> Mary >> >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:54 PM, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote: >> >>> Mary: >>> >>> In response to your comments I have revised the SSTC draft "sstc-saml-assurance-profile-cd-01.odt", see: >>> >>> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SAML2IDAssuranceProfile >>> >>> Note that the document name used to be "Expressing Identity Assurance in SAML V2.0", now it is "SAML V2.0 Identity Assurance Profiles, Version 1.0" so as to be more conformant. The filename is the same. >>> >>> I think it should now be ready for public review. Let me know if more changes need to be made. >>> >>> - RL "Bob" >>> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:12:24 -0500 >>> From: Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU> >>> To: "rlmorgan@washington.edu" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>, Josh Howlett <josh.howlett@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Harold Lockhart <hal.lockhart@oracle.com>, Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@mit.edu> >>> Subject: FW: Starting 60-day Public Review of SSTC docs >>> >>> >>> Bob, Josh, >>> >>> >>> >>> It seems Mary needs some more information about the formatting >>> >>> of these docs. Her email is below (with a checklist of format items) >>> >>> for both the LOA and Kerberos related docs. >>> >>> >>> >>> The Templates/Guides page of Oasis is here if you need it: >>> >>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> /thomas/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: marypmcrae@gmail.com [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae >>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:38 PM >>> To: Thomas Hardjono; Harold Lockhart >>> Subject: Re: Starting 60-day Public Review of SSTC docs >>> >>> >>> >>> As I'm looking at the other docs I'm just guessing that none of these declare >>> one of the 3 versions authoritative; if they do, that's great; if not, they need >>> to :) >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> I would really be helpful if the editors could check the specifications prior >>> to sending them to me; we seem to have a similar list of problems each time a >>> handful of specifications are submitted by the TC. >>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/QAChecklistV3.html >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Mary >>> >>> >>> >>> Expressing Identity Assurance in SAML V2.0 >>> >>> 1. each specification must be identified by a version number >>> 2. unable to determine the date of approval, although unlikely that it's 30 Nov >>> since meeting was held on 1 December. >>> 3. Specification URIs >>> - This version: need to be actual hypertext links >>> - Previous version: should be N/A >>> - Latest Version: missing >>> 4. Technical Committee needs to be a hypertext link >>> 5. Chairs - I have no idea how long ago this document was approved as a CD, but >>> Hal hasn't been BEA for quite some time >>> 6. Editors - Similarly, it's been a while since Liberty chose not to renew its >>> membership but Eric Tiffany is listed as Editor. >>> 7. Declared XML Namespace: should be 'N/A' if none >>> 8. Running footer: date says 27 July 2009. unable to determine if this date is >>> correct or not. must be date CD was approved. >>> 9. Normative references: All references to OASIS TC documents must follow the >>> citation format shown in the templates: >>> ---example--- >>> NOTE: The proper format for a citation to an OASIS Technical Committee's work >>> (whether Normative or Non-Normative) is: >>> >>> OASIS >>> Stage (Committee Draft 01, Committee Draft 02, Committee Specifcation 01, etc. >>> or Standard) >>> Title (italicized or in quotation marks) >>> Approval Date (Month YYYY) >>> URI of the actual Authoritative Specification (namespace is not acceptable as >>> the content changes over time) >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> [EDXL-HAVE] >>> OASIS Standard, "Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability >>> Exchange (HAVE) Version 1.0", November 2008. >>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-have/os/emergency_edxl_have-1.0-spec- >>> os.doc >>> ---end example--- >>> >>> 10. Conformance Section must be last numbered section immediately preceding >>> appendices. >>> >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]