RE: [security-services] Re: Proposed Agenda for SSTC Call (May 18, 2010)

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

> I think one important item that was raised is that the SP would like
> to get control back from the Target IDP regardless of success/
> failure.

I presumed so, that's why I thought it was probably better to try and
compromise, and look at it as an AuthnRequest (which generally mandates a
response) rather than a Response (with some implication that another
response is supposed to follow).

-- Scott