Subject: Re: [security-services] ID assurance 15 day review NOT started
Hi Mary, resent from previous thread|
On 26/08/2010 12:03 PM, Mary McRae wrote:
AANLkTin3ng_h-0eLXk-vWTWMGC5LmOJpX1gvsZiN73Nc@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">My apologies to Paul and the TC; apparently my email woes are not yet quite over but will hopefully be resolved as soon as the remaining 50000 email messages are transferred from one account to the other.
Change Log for "SAML V2.0 Identity Assurance Profiles Version 1.0" between CD01 and CD02 1) Reworked Section 1.1 'Motivation' to be more focussed and concise. Made more explicit the two distinct pieces of the document - 1) a metadata profile for expressing assurance certifications and 2) guidelines for using authncontext to carry assurance 2) Updated the reference in Section 1.5 'Non-normative references' to point to the Kantara Initiative Identity Assurance Framework 3) Significant reworking of Section 2 'AuthnContext Level-of-Assurance Profile', changed title to 'AuthnContext Identity Assurance Guidelines' Changed section from what had been cast as a normative profile into non-normative guidelines for using authncontext to carry assurance levels. Replaced schema constructs with prose guidelines for defining LOA class URIs - now found in Section 2.1 4) In Section 3 'Identity Assurance Certification Attribute Profile', added detail to the 'Profile Overview' in Section 3.2 as to how certification information is added to an entities metadata. 5) In Section 3.6 'Example', added detail as to how certification information is added to an entities metadata 6) Removed Section 4.1 'AuthnContext Level-of-Assurance Profile Conformance' as the profile in question was recast as guidelines - obviating the need for conformance