Re: [security-services] Recommended Documents for SAML 2.1

["Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

On 6/24/13 8:25 AM, "La Joie, Chad" <Chad.LaJoie@covisint.com> wrote:

>Docs corresponding to ones we have today:
>authn context
>bindings
>conformance
>core
>glossary
>metadata

Security and Privacy Considerations

>Attributes (should the xacml profile be moved out in favor of moving it
>into the XACML/SAML binding document?)

That isn't ours though, so the XACML TC would have to agree to pick that
up.

>Anything that you guys can think of that is missing?  Any others that
>should be combined or split apart in order to improve readability?

I suspect having some material about practical use of AuthnContext in the
Single Sign On document would be useful. If we can agree what practical
means.

-- Scott