Re: [security-services] FW: SAML 2.1 Doc Template Requests

[Nate Klingenstein <ndk@internet2.edu>]

It sounds like less time invested in formatting and maintaining links, which means more time for spec development, which is great.

I'd hope it would be that it remains possible(or, becomes easier) to create deep links to each of the sections in each of the documents.  If that's the case, then I'm all in favor of the multi-part document.

On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:26 , La Joie, Chad wrote:

> Paul and Chet would like to take a slightly different approach with the SAML 2.1 spec documents by following a new “multi-part” document approach.  Attached is a word document from them describing what this would look like for us.  To me, this sound reasonable but I wanted to get everyone’s agreement that it was the right way to go forward.
>