[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Initial non-technical comments re: attribute request extension
A model for this kind of extension would be [1], which was one of the earliest extensions done post-2.0. The templates now will be quite different than the older one there, but the general outline is probably suitable, and it includes a metadata extension attribute for signaling whether one supports the extension (which in this case would be added to an IdP's <SingleSignOnService> element). A plausible title might be "SAML V2.0 Protocol Extension for Single Sign-On Attribute Request Version 1.0" (All specs have to be versioned now.) -- Scott [1] https://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/ProtocolExtThirdParty
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]