Re: Additional straw man 3 changes

[Jeff Hodges <jhodges@oblix.com>]

My $0.02..

Darren Platt wrote:
> 1. Have the scenarios that are relevant to a specific use case follow that
> use case in the document.  That way there will essentially be 2 sections of
> scenarios (based on the current scope) - one for each of the high level use
> cases (Single Signon and Authorization Service).

sounds fine.

> 2. Change all references to authC to authN.  I think this was the
> convention we agreed to as a TC.

Yes.

> 3. Use Dave Orchard's suggested notation for candidate requirements in the
> issues list and ballots.

sounds fine.

thanks,

JeffH