Re: Issue Group 5 BALLOT

[George_Robert_Blakley_III@tivoli.com]

All,

I agree that we should count and report the votes, and I also agree that we
should collect the ballot comments
for discussion by the group.  Just for the record, I think it's important
to capture comments on issues we vote
to *remove* from the document, in case upon consideration of the comments
some of us decide that we were
too hasty in rejecting a requirement.

--bob

Bob Blakley
Chief Scientist
Enterprise Solutions Unit
Tivoli Systems, Inc. (an IBM Company)


Jeff Hodges <jhodges@oblix.com>@spoon.alink.net on 02/24/2001 02:34:32 PM

Please respond to security-use@lists.oasis-open.org

Sent by:  jhodges@spoon.alink.net


To:   security-use@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
Subject:  Re: Issue Group 5 BALLOT



Darren Platt wrote:
>
> I think the right thing to do here is to process the votes and proceed
with
> the voted actions.

I agree.

> We could then capture people's comments in the issues
> doc in a section for each issue called something like 'Ballot Comments',
> attributing the comments to the people who make them.

Yes.

> What will happen is that while people are thinking these isses through in
> order to vote, they will come up with more detail that they will want to
> capture about a requirement, and need a place to put it.  I think that we
> shouldn't lose this detail, but instead capture it.

absolutely.

> I don't think everyone's comments were intended this way, though, so
perhaps
> what we should do is ask that people are clear about what they would like
to
> happen when they make a comment - to have it noted on the issue list,
> whether it should be directly attributed to them, to open a new issue, or
> simply to have everyone know where they stand.

Ok, I'll see about clarifying my comments.

thanks,

JeffH

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: security-use-request@lists.oasis-open.org