Re: Voting Results

[Jeff Hodges <jhodges@oblix.com>]

I have some questions on the voting results. Thanks for your work on putting
all this together.  

JeffH

Darren Platt wrote:
> 
> Resolutions which passed will be noted as well.

The criteria is that a minimum of 75% of "votes cast" would constitute passage
of the item, yes? (that is what I have in my notes from the 4th concall of
21-Feb-2001 Wed)

> 
> Issue Group 1
> Ballots recieved from: Bob Blakley, Nigel Edwards, Marlena Erdos, Jeff
> Hodges, MaryAnn Hondo, Prateek Mishra, Darren Platt, Evan Prodoromou, and
> Irving Ried.
> 
> Issue UC-1-1
> Resolution #1: 6 votes
> Resolution #2: 0 votes
> Abstaining: 3 votes
> 
> UC-1-2
> 1: 7
> 2: 2 - Passes

You mean option #1 passed in UC-1-2, yes?   ( 7/9 ~= 78% )

> UC-1-3
> 1: 2
> 2: 8 - Passes
> 
> UC-1-4
> 1: 0
> 2: 3
> 3: 6
> 
> UC-1-5
> 1: 6
> 2: 3
> 
> UC-1-6
> 1: 9 - Passes
> 2: 0
> 
> UC-1-7
> 1: 7
> 2: 2

#1 in UC-1-7 passed, yes?

> UC-1-8
> 1: 9
> 2: 0

#1 in UC-1-8 passed, yes?


> UC-1-9
> 1: 8 - Passes
> 2: 0
> A: 1
> 
> UC-1-10
> 1: 2
> 2: 6
> 
> UC-1-11
> 1: 9 - Passes
> 2: 0
> 
> Issue Group 3
> Ballots received from: Bob Blakley, Nigel Edwards, Marlena Erdos, Kelly Emo,
> Jeff Hodges, Prateek Mishra, David Orchard, Darren Platt, Evan Prodromou,
> Irving Reid
> 

[snip]


> Issue Group 5
> Ballots received from: Bob Blakley, Nigel Edwards, Marlena Erdos, Kelly Emo,
> MaryAnn Hondo, Prateek Mishra, David Orchard, Darren Platt, Evan Prodromou,
> Irving Ried.
> 
> UC-5-1A
> Y: 8
> N: 3
> 
> UC-5-1B
> Y: 8
> N: 3
> 
> UC-5-2
> Y: 3
> N: 5
> A: 2
> 
> UC-5-3A
> Y: 1
> N: 10 - Passes
> 
> UC-5-3B
> Y: 10 - Passes
> N: 1
> 
> UC-5-3C
> Y: 7
> N: 4


You list 10 folks as having voted, but the counts add up to 11 (except for
UC-5-2 where it adds up to 10), and I voted but I'm not listed. So it seems
that perhaps the count for UC-5-2 needs adjustment, plus I should be listed as
having voted. 



---
end