[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: ISSUE:[UC-8-0*:Intermediaries*]
I am baffled that this has not generated more discussion. The role of intermediaries and security on XML Protocol has been going on for months now. I would have liked to see more discussion on our domain model/abstract model on this concept. I show the following links to illustrate XP's discussion of intermediaries as it seems extremely relevent. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-reqs-05.html#fig1 Requirements doc showing intermediaries There is a good definition of an XP Intermediary, which seems equivalent to a SAML intermediary: Dave Orchard XML Architect Jamcracker Inc., 19000 Homestead Dr., Cupertino, CA 95014 p: 408.864.5118 m: 604.908.8425 f: 408.725.4310 www.jamcracker.com - Sounds like a job for Jamcracker.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC