[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: ISSUE:[UC-6-01:XMLProtocol]
I definitely think we should mandate a SOAP 1.1 binding. There has been no public statement (that I know of) from Microsoft or IBM indicating that they will not ship a subsequent SOAP spec or discontinue work on SOAP in favour of XMLP. This is an implicit assumption that has not been explicitly stated. I think if XMLP delivers a spec within a timely manner, this will be the likely outcome. But there is no current XMLP spec that we could bind to. That's what I mean by no such deliverable. It just ain't there yet, though everybody wants it. So we should mandate the thing that exists (SOAP 1.1), and re-open an additional binding to something like xmlp once xmlp ships and appears to be endorsed. For the same reasons that I don't endorse requirements containing forward references to XMLE (which doesn't exist yet), I don't like forward references to XMLP. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@entegrity.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:26 AM > To: 'Orchard, David'; security-use@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: ISSUE:[UC-6-01:XMLProtocol] > > > I think the heart of the issue is "should we mandate support > for SOAP?" I am > not close to these efforts, but my impression is that SOAP is > an interim > thing which will go away soon. Please give us the benefit of > your knowledge > in this area. > > Hal > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Orchard, David [mailto:dorchard@jamcracker.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:06 PM > > To: security-use@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: ISSUE:[UC-6-01:XMLProtocol] > > > > > > There is no such deliverable as XML Protocol specification. > > We don't know > > when an XMLP 1.0 spec will ship. We can NEVER have forward > > references in > > specifications. When XMLP ships, we can easily change the > > requirements. > > > > There is SOAP 1.1. > > > > Dave Orchard > > XML Architect > > Jamcracker Inc., 19000 Homestead Dr., Cupertino, CA 95014 > > p: 408.864.5118 m: 604.908.8425 f: 408.725.4310 > > > > www.jamcracker.com - Sounds like a job for Jamcracker. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: > > security-use-request@lists.oasis-open.org > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC