RE: Another issue about Issue Group 12 (Encryption)

[Darren Platt <dplatt@securant.com>]

Nice catch.  We will note this on the group 12 final ballot (unless there is
some objection, of course).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Irving Reid [mailto:Irving.Reid@baltimore.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 4:33 PM
> To: 'security-use@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Subject: Another issue about Issue Group 12 (Encryption)
>
>
> I was just re-reading the Strawman 3 document, and noticed that there is
> currently an explicit non-goal that SAML will not protect messages from
> interception by third parties; this is left up to the transport mechanism.
>
> The issue group 12 decisions may force removal of this non-goal
> (specifically, if we choose encryption of individual SAML messages or
> assertions)
>
>  - irving -
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: security-use-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>