RE: ISSUE:[UC-2-05: MarketPlace] Revisited

["Platt, Darren" <dplatt@securant.com>]

I agree that this scenario should be added to the requirements doc.

Darren


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mishra, Prateek [mailto:pmishra@netegrity.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:22 PM
> To: 'security-use@lists.oasis-open.org '
> Subject: ISSUE:[UC-2-05: MarketPlace] Revisited
> 
> 
> 
> Fellow use-case afficionados,
> 
> During the con-call (Wed, April 11) Zahid A. and I
> expressed our concern that not a single use-case
> scenario from Issue group 2 was added to the use-case
> document from the last ballot.
> 
> In particular, we focussed on ISSUE:[UC-2-05:MarketPlace]
> as a relatively concrete and somewhat important use-case
> scenario. During discussion it emerged that there was 
> considerable support for ISSUE:[UC-2-05: MarketPlace] but that
> there were serious concerns about the role of credentials
> in the scenario as written.
> 
> I have re-written [UC-2-05:MarketPlace] to remove the offending
> materials and simplified the message flow down to a single
> message transfer step. I am looking for consensus within this
> group on the matter of including this material as a sub-case
> of Use Case 3 (Back-Office Transaction).
> 
> Please indicate your support or objections to the
> inclusion of this use-case scenario in the use-case
> document. The proposed text is attached.
> This is not meant as
> a formal vote but as a means of coming to consensus on this
> relatively narrow issue before we meet at the Waltham F2F.
> 
> 
> - prateek
> 
> ------
> Attachments are virus free!
> 
> This message has been scanned for viruses at the originating end by
> Nemx Anti-Virus for MS Exchange Server/IMC
> 	http://www.nemx.com/products/antivirus
> 
>   
> 
>