RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations

["Miko Matsumura" <mmatsumura@infravio.com>]

That's an interesting point, I'll sort that out with the OASIS staff and we will find a suitable solution if possible.

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com] 
	Sent: Tue 9/27/2005 7:02 AM 
	To: Miko Matsumura 
	Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org 
	Subject: Re: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations
	
	

	That's fine with me, but under OASIS rules, unless the later call is
	formal, it wouldn't be sufficient to maintain voting rights. Obviously
	if it were formal and anyone who attended the prior meeting didn't
	attend the AsiaPac meeting, they'd then run the risk of losing voting
	rights if they missed the next formal meeting.
	
	Mark.
	
	
	Miko Matsumura wrote:
	
	>Hi Everyone,
	>
	>Results from the informal poll are in:
	>
	>Quick Summary of Voting Results:
	> - 8AM PST (GMT-008) received 13 Votes
	> - 9AM PST received 18 Votes
	> - 1PM PST received 7 Votes
	> - 4PM PST received 3 Votes
	> - 7PM PST received 0 Votes
	> - 10PM PST received 3 Votes
	>
	>I think it's best that we go with 9AM Pacific Time, and we hold perhaps
	>a later informational call for AsiaPac...
	>
	>How would Monday October 3 be for a next call date?
	>
	>Best,
	>Miko
	>
	> 
	>
	
	--
	Mark Little
	Chief Architect
	Arjuna Technologies Ltd
	www.arjuna.com